Tuesday, August 16, 2005

Tuesday - im going mad!

well, today has just been awful for cable hasnt it. The wise wouldve left it well alone today although im sure many have made money.

There have only been 2 hilda trades on cable worth taking that being a brilliant 4 hour / 1 hour trade that happened before i got out of bed (well done andre for taking that) and the next one was a 30 min/15 min short at 10am mt time short which didnt present itself as a low risk opportunity so wasnt taken.

only one official hilda trade on the 5 min was at around 11:25 long 1. 8092 - this failed for -15 pips

spent the rest of the day looking for opportunities that werent there whilst at the same time missing golden hilda calls on EJ and swissy.

nuff said - im calling it a day PAH!!

12 comments:

John Smith said...

Hi Soul. Is it correct that you're using the jurik tpo indicator as part of your system?

Soultrader said...

The pukka Jurik isnt available for metatrader is it?

spahiu said...

it is..or so i think :) can't be sure though since i never saw the real one...
and u didn't answer the man's question :)

Soultrader said...

might be, might not :)

John Smith said...

Soul, it is available fot mt. You can find it at the mt yahoo group, in the "100 indicators for mt4" under the name J_TPO.

But I guess you already knew that. :)

Soultrader said...

yes, its not a pukka jurik tho is it.

anyway, what difference does it make - i aint selling indicators

John Smith said...

What's a pukka jurik anyways? I googled it, and can't find any info on it.

Soultrader said...

a proper one from jurik.com - the one in the 100 indicators for mt is just some programmers attempt to replicate it i believe

John Smith said...

Are you refering to www.jurikres.com ?

If so, I still can't find any mention of it.

Soultrader said...

mention of what?

Soultrader said...

ahh - i see - in the uk pukka is slang for genuine

John Smith said...

Lol, didn't knew that one. :)

How can you know if the mt indicator from the yahoo group is not the same as from the original website? Have you compared the code from both?